<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title>Khoa học &amp; Công nghệ</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">2615-9015</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2615-9015</issn>
			<publisher><publisher-name>Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành</publisher-name></publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">8fb0c6f0-2635-8163-809f-01a0fbaf510b</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.55401/2y5rj432</article-id>
			<title-group><article-title>Comparison of oral efficacy between PPIs and H2RAs in subjects for prevention and monitoring of peptic ulcerassociated recurrence rates from 1985 to 2021: A systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title></title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name>Cao Kim Xoa</string-name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name>Tran Vo Ngoc Minh</string-name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><string-name>Nguyen Diem Kieu</string-name></contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>1</month><year>2024</year></pub-date>
			<volume>5</volume>
			<issue>3</issue>
			<fpage>12</fpage>
			<lpage>12</lpage>
			<self-uri content-type="html" xlink:href="https://jst.ntt.edu.vn/articles/8fb0c6f0-2635-8163-809f-01a0fbaf510b" />
			<self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="https://uploadservice.ntt.edu.vn/dbOBrwZN1R_1/file/8_comparison_of_oral_efficacy_between_261002-Edwq54TnB9T8.pdf" />
			<abstract><p>Currently, although there are many randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors and H2-antihistamines in relation to peptic ulcer disease, meta-analytical studies on this topic are still limited and conclusions have not come to consensus. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration tool is essential. From January 1st, 1985, to May 31st, 2022, the study was carried out on three databases: Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase. Statistics are expressed as odds ratios, with confidence intervals of 95 %, and a random effects model is used. Results: Proton pump inhibitors increase the effectiveness of treatment more than H2-antihistamines. Specifically, on prevention subjects = 0.15 (95 % CI: 0.05-0.44), patients who are monitored for relapse rates without medication = 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.75-1.14), and with medication = 0.50 (95 % CI: 0.31-0.80). In conclusion, proton pump inhibitors are the first-line medicine for ulcer prevention and post-healing monitoring.</p></abstract>
			
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>